Saturday, January 31, 2009
Doubt about Global Warming is gaining traction
Rightfully so. This is a good article to check out:
The rest of the article is here.
At December's U.N. Global Warming conference in Poznan, Poland, 650 of the world's top climatologists stood up and said man-made global warming is a media generated myth without basis. Said climatologist Dr. David Gee, Chairman of the International Geological Congress, "For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming?"
I asked myself, why would such obviously smart guy say such a ridiculous thing? But it turns out he's right.
The earth's temperature peaked in 1998. It's been falling ever since; it dropped dramatically in 2007 and got worse in 2008, when temperatures touched 1980 levels.
Meanwhile, the University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center released conclusive satellite photos showing that Arctic ice is back to 1979 levels. What's more, measurements of Antarctic ice now show that its accumulation is up 5 percent since 1980.
In other words, during what was supposed to be massive global warming, the biggest chunks of ice on earth grew larger. Just as an aside, do you remember when the hole in the ozone layer was going to melt Antarctica? But don't worry, we're safe now, that was the nineties.
Dr. Kunihiko, Chancellor of Japan's Institute of Science and Technology said this: "CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or the other ... every scientist knows this, but it doesn't pay to say so." Now why would a learned man say such a crazy thing?
This is where the looney left gets lost. Their mantra is atmospheric CO2 levels are escalating and this is unquestionably causing earth's temperature rise. But ask yourself -- if global temperatures are experiencing the biggest sustained drop in decades, while CO2 levels continue to rise -- how can it be true?
The rest of the article is here.
Labels:
Al Gore,
Environment,
Global Warming,
United Nations
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
"Damaged Relations"
As is usually the case, it is not so much the story itself I have an issue with, it's the way the soulless, brain-dead media reports it that confounds me.
In this case, the story is Obama sitting down for an interview with an Arabic TV channel. Okay, whatever. The story itself isn't a big deal, but the way these things actually get written up is usually good for some laughs.
As an example, I give you the AP reporting on Obama's interview the other day:
This sentence leaves no doubt, the AP places the blame for any "damaged relations" with the Muslim world at the feet of George W. Bush.
I mean, it's not like the fact that two airplanes flew into and destroyed a couple of the largest buildings every built a few years ago had anything to do with those relations being "damaged".
Right?
Also in the story:
Where was the massive backlash in America's heartland against Muslims after 9/11? Oh right, there wasn't one.
Where were the riots and burning-of-Muslim-flags parties held? Oh right, there weren't any.
Does anyone else see the absurdity in all of this? Not just the content, but the fact that we are even asking the question: What we must do to repair relations with the Muslim world?
"Something tangible"? "Follow with actions"? — Such as planes flying into buildings? Certainly "tangible" "actions" indeed.
This writer is not waiting for America to bend over backwards to repair relations with the Muslim world. On the contrary, this writer is waiting for the Muslim world to repair relations with America.
Purging itself of the death-cult radicals among it's ranks would be a good start, followed by a complete reformation.
I'm not holding my breath.
In this case, the story is Obama sitting down for an interview with an Arabic TV channel. Okay, whatever. The story itself isn't a big deal, but the way these things actually get written up is usually good for some laughs.
As an example, I give you the AP reporting on Obama's interview the other day:
CAIRO, Egypt – President Barack Obama chose an Arabic satellite TV network for his first formal television interview as president, part of a concerted effort to repair relations with the Muslim world that were damaged under the previous administration.
This sentence leaves no doubt, the AP places the blame for any "damaged relations" with the Muslim world at the feet of George W. Bush.
I mean, it's not like the fact that two airplanes flew into and destroyed a couple of the largest buildings every built a few years ago had anything to do with those relations being "damaged".
Right?
Also in the story:
Obama's predecessor, former President George W. Bush, launched wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which prompted a massive backlash against the U.S. in the Muslim world.
Where was the massive backlash in America's heartland against Muslims after 9/11? Oh right, there wasn't one.
Where were the riots and burning-of-Muslim-flags parties held? Oh right, there weren't any.
In contrast to the enthusiastic reception Obama's victory has garnered around the world, the Arab world has been much more cautious about the new U.S. president — with most people skeptical that American policy in the region will change substantially.
"I can't be optimistic until I see something tangible," said Hatem al-Kurdi, 35, a Gaza City engineer who saw parts of the interview. "Anyone can say nice words, but you have to follow with actions."
Does anyone else see the absurdity in all of this? Not just the content, but the fact that we are even asking the question: What we must do to repair relations with the Muslim world?
"Something tangible"? "Follow with actions"? — Such as planes flying into buildings? Certainly "tangible" "actions" indeed.
This writer is not waiting for America to bend over backwards to repair relations with the Muslim world. On the contrary, this writer is waiting for the Muslim world to repair relations with America.
Purging itself of the death-cult radicals among it's ranks would be a good start, followed by a complete reformation.
I'm not holding my breath.
Labels:
9/11,
Journalism is dead,
Media,
Obama,
Pussification,
Religion Of Peace,
Shameless,
Terrorism,
The Long War
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
"We will defeat you"
As I watched Barack Obama's inaugural address today I have to admit I perked up a little when I heard him say this:
I was impressed by that. And I really hope he means it.
We will not apologize for our way of life nor will we waver in its defense. And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that, 'Our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken. You cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.'
I was impressed by that. And I really hope he means it.
Labels:
Quotes,
Religion Of Peace,
Terrorism,
The Long War
Saturday, January 17, 2009
AP: To avoid financial crisis, become islamic
According to the AP, we could have avoided the economic crisis altogether had we just switched to an islamic financial system:
Well gee whiz...we have finally found the solution to our economic problems!
Seriously, we know the mainstream media is dead, but the fact that some moron actually thought this was a serious, worthwhile news story is further evidence of it.
DETROIT (AP) — Big financial institutions have been battered by mortgages gone bad. But a tiny Michigan bank is getting attention in the industry by turning a profit on loans without even charging interest.
Its specialty: financial products that comply with Islamic law. That means no collecting interest, no short selling and no contracts that are considered exceedingly risky.
It also rules out some of the activity that got Western finance in trouble — subprime mortgages, credit default swaps and the like.
"When you look at the economic crisis we're in, if you were to follow Islamic or Sharia financing, you couldn't have this crisis," said John Sickler, corporate director for the bank, University Islamic Financial Corp. in Ann Arbor.
Well gee whiz...we have finally found the solution to our economic problems!
Seriously, we know the mainstream media is dead, but the fact that some moron actually thought this was a serious, worthwhile news story is further evidence of it.
Labels:
Economy,
Journalism is dead,
Media,
Religion Of Peace
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)